|
Saint Harold (d. 1168) was a child martyr who was reported to have been slain by Jews in Gloucester, England, in 1168.〔Patricia Skinner, ''The Jews in Medieval Britain: Historical, Literary, and Archaeological Perspectives'', Boydell and Brewer, Rochester, NY, 2003, p.130〕 The claims arose in the aftermath of the circulation of the first blood libel myth following the unsolved murder of William of Norwich. A cult of Harold was briefly promoted in Gloucester, but soon died out. He is one of a small group of 12th century England|English saints of strikingly similar characteristics: they were all young boys, all mysteriously found dead and all hailed as martyrs to alleged anti-Christian practices among Jews. Contemporary assumptions made about the circumstances of their deaths evolved into the blood libel.〔Max L. Margolis, ''A History of the Jewish People'', Alexander Marx, Jewish Publication Society of America, Philadelphia, 1927 The accusations following Harold's death came after widely circulated claims of Jewish ritual child-murder in the case of William of Norwich, who died in 1144. The stories created about Harold's death were followed by similar claims about Robert of Bury. The phenomenon culminated in the trials and executions occasioned by the death of Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln. ==Death== Harold's body was apparently found floating in a river.〔Kenneth Stow, ''Jewish Dogs: An Image and Its Interpreters: Continuity in the Catholic-Jewish Encounter'', Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA., 2006, p.85.〕 According to Anna Sapir Abulafia, the local Benedictine monks used the discovery to claim that "the child had been spirited away by the Jews on the 21st February for them to torture him to death on the night of 16th March". They proceeded to identify marks on the body which were supposed to suggest that the child had been made to wear a crown of thorns and had been subject to some form of crucifixion. All of these were features of the mythology created around the death of William of Norwich in Easter 1144. The story was given credence because Jews had apparently been congregating in Gloucester at the time for a Brit milah circumcision ceremony. The ritual spilling of a child's blood in circumcision was symbolically linked in the minds of Christians to the Crucifixion.〔 Events seem to have occurred close to Easter, though inconsistencies the days and dates given in sources suggest a confusion over the year in which the events happened, which may imply a "botched attempt to force dates to fit into the Christian liturgical calendar".〔Anna Sapir Abulafia, ''Christian Jewish Relations 1000-1300: Jews in the Service of Medieval Christendom'', Routledge, 2012, p.174.〕 There is no evidence that any Jews were ever arrested or charged with a crime, which suggests that the claims began as no more than speculation after the missing local child's body was found. The story hardened into fact in later retellings.〔 The attempt to establish a cult of Harold seems to have been unsuccessful. It was never officially supported and died out long before the Reformation.〔Hillaby, Joe, "The ritual-child-murder accusation: its dissemination and Harold of Gloucester", Jewish Historical Studies, vol. 34, (1994-1996), pp. 69-109.〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Harold of Gloucester」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|